9 min readDevSnipe Team
We use privacy-friendly analytics to understand how the site is used. You can opt out any time on our Do Not Sell or Share page. See our Privacy Policy.
If you're freelancing in the automation space, you've probably had a freelance client ask: should we use Make or n8n?
Your platform choice affects what you can charge, how you bill, how fast you deliver, and whether clients stick around for ongoing retainers. This isn't a feature comparison chart. It's a breakdown of how each platform impacts your freelance income when you're doing make vs n8n client work.
Make.com charges based on operations. Every module execution in a scenario costs one operation, and clients pay monthly based on volume. The free tier gives you 1,000 operations per month, and the Core plan runs $12/month on monthly billing or roughly $9-10/month if you commit to an annual plan for 10,000 operations.
n8n takes a fundamentally different approach to pricing that changes the economics of freelancing entirely. The self-hosted Community Edition is free with no execution limits whatsoever. You can run it on a $5/month VPS and process millions of workflow executions without paying n8n a cent. The cloud-hosted Starter plan costs €20/month (roughly $21-22 USD) when billed annually, which gets you 2,500 executions. Monthly billing runs higher.
Here's where it gets interesting for freelancers. With Make, your client is always paying Make directly. With self-hosted n8n, you control the infrastructure. You can bundle hosting into your retainer, mark it up, and own the relationship entirely.
A typical setup: you spin up n8n on a $10/month VPS, charge the client $150/month for "managed automation infrastructure," and pocket the difference. Try doing that with Make.
Make projects tend to cluster in the $500-$2,000 range for one-off builds. The visual builder is approachable enough that budget-conscious clients sometimes try to DIY it after watching a YouTube tutorial. That puts downward pressure on your rates.
n8n projects skew higher. The self-hosted setup creates a natural barrier to entry, and the code nodes mean you can build things that simply aren't possible in Make. Based on job postings across freelance platforms, average project values for n8n tend to run $1,500-$5,000+, especially when AI integrations are involved.
Make has way more name recognition, though. Clients search for "Make.com automation expert" far more often than "n8n developer," which means a thinner pipeline even when individual n8n projects pay more.
Make's strength is speed for standard integrations. Connect Typeform to Google Sheets to Slack. Done in 20 minutes. It has 3,000+ app integrations out of the box, and most of them work without writing a single line of code.
n8n has grown significantly, now listing over 1,800 integrations on their directory, and the HTTP Request node and Code nodes mean you're never actually stuck. If an API exists, you can connect to it. And you can write JavaScript or Python directly inside the workflow, which opens up data transformation and business logic that visual-only tools can't touch.
This distinction matters enormously for client work because the highest-paying projects are rarely "connect A to B." They're "build me a custom pipeline that processes inbound leads, enriches them with company data from three APIs, scores them with AI, and routes them to different CRM pipelines based on the score." That kind of project is painful in Make because you're fighting the visual builder at every turn, chaining dozens of modules together with router after router. In n8n, you write a 30-line Code node and move on.
If you're building workflows that involve AI agent development or complex API integrations, n8n gives you room to work that Make simply doesn't.
DevSnipe sends you AI automation jobs from Upwork, Skool, and more before most people see them.
Make is easier to hand off. The visual interface is clean, the documentation is solid, and most non-technical clients can at least understand what a scenario does when they look at it. This is great for one-off projects but terrible for retainers. If the client can figure it out themselves, why would they keep paying you?
n8n is harder to hand off by default, especially self-hosted instances. Clients need you for updates, monitoring, and troubleshooting. That's recurring revenue. A well-structured n8n retainer can run $300-$800/month per client for ongoing management, and clients rarely churn because switching costs are high.
The smart play is to standardize your n8n deployment. Use Docker Compose for reproducible environments, set up Uptime Kuma for uptime monitoring so you catch issues before clients do, document your stack thoroughly, and package the whole thing as a managed service. Three to five retainer clients at $500/month each is $1,500-$2,500/month in predictable revenue. That kind of recurring base changes how you think about your business because you stop chasing one-off gigs out of desperation and start being selective about the projects you take.
Don't write off Make entirely. It's the better choice in several common situations that come up regularly in freelance work.
When a client's budget sits under $1,000 and they want to own the account themselves, Make is the obvious pick. Same when you need a fast turnaround on a straightforward integration, something you can ship in under a week without touching infrastructure. If the client already has a Make account with existing scenarios, modifying those is almost always cheaper than rebuilding in n8n. And when you're building for a non-technical team that genuinely needs to make minor adjustments without calling you every time, Make's visual interface is a real advantage rather than a limitation.
Some freelancers offer both, quoting Make for simple jobs and n8n for anything complex. That's a reasonable approach as long as you're clear with clients about the tradeoffs upfront. The danger is spreading yourself too thin early on, which brings us to specialization.
Specialization pays. If you're starting out in , pick one platform and go deep before branching out.
Get matched to jobs across Upwork, Skool, and more. Free tier includes daily alerts with 3 full job details per day.
For Make, that means learning every module type, understanding the operation billing model inside and out, and being able to improve scenarios for cost efficiency when clients are bleeding money on unnecessary executions. Your selling point is speed and reliability on standard integrations, and the ability to hand clients a system they can partially manage themselves.
For n8n, invest time in self-hosting, Docker, and basic server administration. Learn the Code node well enough that you can write custom JavaScript for any data transformation a client needs. Build templates for common client requests like lead capture pipelines, CRM data syncs, and notification routing. Your selling point is flexibility, ownership, and the ability to build things that no-code tools literally cannot replicate.
The freelancers earning strong five-figure months in automation aren't generalists. They're known for one thing and they do it exceptionally well. The depth of expertise is what commands premium rates, not the breadth of tools listed on a profile.
With Make, project-based billing is standard. You quote a flat fee for the build, deliver it, and move on. Some freelancers add a small monthly fee ($50-$150) for "support and monitoring," but Make's reliability means there's not much to actively monitor.
With n8n, you have more billing options, and the right structure can significantly change your income trajectory:
Here's a concrete example that works: charge $2,500 for the initial n8n build, then $450/month for managed hosting, monitoring, and up to 4 hours of maintenance per month. That maintenance buffer rarely gets fully used, but clients love knowing it's there. Over 12 months, that single client is worth $7,900 in total revenue from one project, compared to a Make build where you might collect $1,500 and never hear from them again.
The retainer model is where n8n really shines. You're providing infrastructure, not just configuration. Clients understand why ongoing infrastructure management costs more than a one-time scenario setup.
n8n pays better per project and creates stronger retainer opportunities. Make has a larger market and faster delivery for simple work. If you're building for income growth, n8n is the better long-term bet, especially as AI workflows get more complex and clients need custom code inside their automations.
If you're optimizing for deal flow and quick wins to build a portfolio, Make gets you there faster. You'll close more deals at lower price points, which is exactly what you need when you're still building your reputation and collecting testimonials.
The strongest position is having both in your toolkit but marketing yourself as an expert in one. If you're under six months into freelancing, start with Make for the deal flow. Once you've shipped 10+ projects and have a steady pipeline, transition toward n8n for the margins. Check DevSnipe's job board to see what clients are actually requesting right now and where the demand is shifting.
The self-hosted Community Edition is free with no execution limits. You pay only for the server, typically $5-$20/month on a VPS depending on how many workflows you're running. The cloud-hosted Starter plan costs €20/month (about $21-22 USD) billed annually. For client work, self-hosting is almost always the better option because you control the environment and can bundle hosting into your fees.
n8n projects typically command higher rates because they require more technical skill: self-hosting, code nodes, API work, and ongoing infrastructure management. Based on freelance job postings, project values tend to run 2-3x higher than comparable Make projects. The tradeoff is a smaller pool of clients actively searching for n8n help.
Eventually, yes. But start with one and build a reputation there first. Spreading yourself thin across both platforms early on means you're mediocre at two things instead of great at one. Once you have steady income from one platform, add the other to expand your service offerings.
Make.com has significantly more job postings across freelance platforms. It's been around longer and has stronger brand recognition with non-technical buyers. n8n postings are growing fast though, especially for projects that involve AI, custom APIs, or complex data processing where visual-only builders hit their limits.
Make uses an operation-based model at $12/month billed monthly (or $9-10 annually) for 10,000 operations on the Core plan. n8n's self-hosted edition is completely free with unlimited executions, while the cloud Starter plan runs €20/month ($21-22 USD) billed annually for 2,500 executions. For freelancers focused on margins, n8n's self-hosted option wins because you can bundle infrastructure costs into your retainer and keep the spread.